The first point we need to make is that the ECSC is designed for low-risk, straightforward works. If there is a high risk of damage to your property, we would strongly recommend you use the ECC instead. 

If you have already let the contract, then you and the contractor are both bound by the terms of the contract. They cannot be changed unless both agree – see clause 12.2 as to how this should be done. 
 It is very difficult to say what implications changing the contractor’s liability may have on you as it will depend upon the work and circumstances. For example, if the contractor was carrying out £20,000 worth of refurbishment work in your building and accidently knocked the building down, the cost implications could be a lot higher than the contract value.

Clause 80.1 does not have a direct relationship with the insurance table, but it does have an indirect relationship. The insurer is only liable to the extent the contractor is, so will be covered by any limits in the contract. 

‘Employer’s property’ is not a defined term, so it will mean what the English words mean. You may need to get some legal advice on that if you are not sure, as it may or may not include the works being carries out. The term property in the third insurance covers all property, no matter who owns it. But it does specifically exclude the works, plant and materials and equipment as they are covered by the first two insurances.


This website uses cookies, so that we can provide you with the best user experience.
By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used.
To find out more about which cookies we use and how you can manage them, please see our Cookie Policy