The importance of keeping the NEC supply chain involved post-Covid

The importance of keeping the NEC supply chain involved post-Covid
 

The post-Covid world is likely to be dominated by disruptive forces which will adversely affect construction costs and time for a considerable period. A combination of factors arising from the pandemic are already creating headaches for supply chains, including delays in sourcing materials, increased materials and transportation costs, and the lack of skilled tradespeople.

In addition, the financial pressures on construction businesses have multiplied. For example, UK subcontractors are also now experiencing a negative impact on cashflow due to the imposition of reverse-charge value added tax since March 2021. The huge hikes in premiums for professional indemnity cover are also taking their toll, particularly on consultants (see Issue 110).
 
Indeed the cashflow position for many firms is becoming precarious. According to insolvency specialists Begbies Traynor, there has been a 27% annual increase in UK construction firms experiencing financial distress. In their rush to securing work post-Covid, consultants,contractors, subcontractors and suppliers could also end up over-trading, putting their businesses in peril.

Collaboration is critical
So, as we enter an extremely fragile and uncertain post-pandemic world, the collaborative and risk management mechanisms in NEC contracts take on an even greater significance. The two key mechanisms are the early warning register and early warning meetings. I want to focus on the latter.

I am often surprised when I hear that NEC main contract early warning meetings have not included parties other than the project manager and main contractor. This is particularly strange when one considers that as much as 90% of project values are delivered by subcontractors.

For example, if there is a likely to be disruption to steel supplies, it is axiomatic that the steelwork subcontractor should be in attendance and even its steel stockholder. NEC early warning meetings are about engaging all parties − relevant to the risk in question − to discuss and agree best-for project    outcomes that minimise the impact on quality, time and cost. The presence of the client and design consultants may also be helpful in finding a solution.
 
Project managers should therefore ensure that all key players are involved in early warning meetings. Moreover, they should be the decision makers in their respective businesses. Unless this happens it is difficult to see how best-for-project outcomes can be achieved as we start to rebuild the global economy.
Recent Projects

Recent news

An interview with Ryan, Assistant Quantity Surveyor

An interview with Ryan, Assistant Quantity Surveyor for Trebes

Ryan, Assistant Quantity Surveyor at Trebes talked about his experience of taking the Project Manager Accreditation course and the multiple-choice question assessment.

Read more
Why and how original designers should stay involved in NEC4 ECC

Why and how original designers should stay involved in NEC4 ECC

There is a risk that an NEC4 ECC project manager does not have sufficient design knowledge to accept the contractor’s design and change the scope appropriately.

Read more
NEC meets Sydney Water and NSW government to support reform

NEC meets Sydney Water and NSW government to support reform

With over 1000 participants, the event connected players to discuss challenges and opportunities, and strengthen industry relationships for a better and more sustainable infrastructure delivery.

Read more
View all news