A4232 Eastern Bay Link, Cardiff, UK

A4232 Eastern Bay Link, Cardiff, UK
  • location:
    Queensgate to Ocean Way, Cardiff Docks, Cardiff, UK
  • Value:
    £57 million
  • Contracts Used:

    NEC3 ECC Option C, NEC3 PSC

  • Start-Finish:
    2015-2017
  • Employer:
    Welsh Government
  • Contractor:
    Dawnus Ferrovial Agroman Joint Venture
  • Project Manager:
    WSP

The NEC-procured Eastern Bay Link provides a vital new 1.2 km dual carriageway through the Cardiff Docks area. It extends the Welsh capital’s A4232 southern perimeter road to the east, significantly reducing traffic congestion on existing urban roads.
 
The new link also increases accessibility from the east of Cardiff to the city’s major employment sites, reduces journey times for private and commercial road users and helps with economic regeneration. It enhances road safety and provides more opportunities for cycling and walking. Overall it improves the resilience of the strategic road network around Cardiff.
 
The new elevated road runs along the north side of Roath Dock, traversing existing dock roads, a private railway, a 1.5 m diameter Victorian sewer and strategic gas pipes, fibre optic cables and electricity mains. It connects with the A4232 Queensgate roundabout and Ocean Way roundabout at each end via approach viaducts and embankments.
 
The Welsh government awarded the design and construction to a joint venture of Dawnus and Ferrovial Agroman on a two-stage, early-contractor-involvement basis in January 2015. The NEC3 Professional Services Contract (PSC) was adopted for preliminary design followed by the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) Option C (target contract with activity schedule) for detailed design and construction.
 
The client engaged WSP as NEC project manager and the contractor subcontracted design elements to Capita and Cass Hayward, all using the NEC3 PSC.
 
PRELIMNARY DESIGN CHANGES
 
The original programme was for 27 weeks of preliminary design followed by 78 weeks of detailed design and construction. However, early in the design phase several issues were identified that seriously threatened the viability of scheme and risked leading to a 12 month delay.
 
The location of a 350 m length of 1.5 m diameter, 7m deep Victorian sewer that needed diverting could not be accurately located due to silting, and critical 132 kV electricity cables could not be diverted until 6 months later than the programme required. Land acquisition was also delayed, further traffic modelling was required and the previously prepared environmental statement needed amending to accommodate advance works.
 
Under the NEC’s required ‘spirit of mutual trust and cooperation’ and incentives built into the ECC through Z clauses, the team worked together to resolve the issues as quickly and cost-effectively as possible.
 
Firstly, three new access shafts were built onto the sewer to remove silt and establish its exact position, from which it became clear there was no feasible diversionary route available within the site. The team then successfully proposed replacing part of the approach embankments with approach viaducts, allowing the existing sewer to remain in place. By careful siting of the approach viaduct piers, most other planned service diversions were also avoided. This approach also allowed for spanning over the 132 kV electricity cables and other services, avoiding the need for diversion and their associated impact on programme
 
The £3.2 million cost of the approach viaducts was paid for using savings to statutory diversions using Z clauses in the contract designed to incentivise innovation. Dawnus Ferrovial Agroman project manager John Evans says, ‘Though the costs were theoretically covered by the Z clauses, it was a risky alternative and took a leap of faith on our part to proceed with it – something we probably would not have done without the collaborative ethos and risk management processes of NEC’.
 
FLEXIBLITY AND COLLABORATION
 
Using the flexibility afforded in NEC, the client amended the ECC to allow preliminary and detailed design to overlap by 10 weeks, but on the basis that once enabling works were completed there was no guarantee that main construction works would proceed. The team also worked pro-actively with local landowners to deliver tangible improvements to their assets and speed up the land acquisition process.
 
James Evans, project manager for WSP says, ‘I have been very pleased with the flexible proactive approach the joint venture team adopted in redesigning the scheme to deal with issues surrounding services and access. Following successful completion of the enabling works, an excellent start was made on the main construction works.
 
The contract was reviewed to check that all remaining service diversions could be carried out under a non-statutory environmental assessment. Detailed design of the roundabouts was separated from the main link while a new traffic model was developed, and the environmental statement was revised. The main construction was delayed until March 2016.
 
According to John Evans, ‘The team worked closely during the preliminary design to overcome major issues by working flexibly, and this approach continued in the detailed design phase and throughout the rest of construction. Without NEC’s flexibility and obligation to work in a spirt of mutual trust and cooperation, it would have been very difficult – if not impossible – for the project team to reinvest in a completely new design, allow such an overlap in design and construction, and still complete on time and budget.’
 
Rhys Griffith, project manager for the Welsh Government, says, ‘The challenges and solutions delivered on this scheme have kept us busy for the last two years. It is a story of the benefits of early contractor involvement and collaborative working at its best.
 
BENEFITS OF USING NEC
 

  • The NEC obligation to act in a ‘spirit of mutual trust and cooperation’ fostered a collaborative, problem-solving approach to overcome the major constraints identified during the preliminary design stage.
  • Flexibility of the NEC contract allowed significant redesign, overlapping preliminary and detailed design phases, separation of detailed design elements and a later construction start while still ensuring completion on time and within budget.
  • NEC Z clauses incentivised the contractor to reduce £6.3 million of statutory diversion costs, which in turn made the £3.2 million cost of the alternative design viable.

 
FURTHER INFORMATION
 
Contact: John Evans, Project Manager, Dawnus Ferrovial Agroman (DFA) Joint Venture, Wales, UK
Tel: +44 1792 781870
Email: johnevans@dawnus.co.uk 
Web: gov.wales/topics/transport/roads/schemes/a4232/eastern-bay-link

Back to Previous PageBack

NEC CONTRACT FINDER

Not sure which
contract you need?
Start Finder

Q2. What is the risk / complexity level of your project?

Q2. What is the risk / complexity level of your project?

Q2. What is the risk / complexity level of your project?

Q2. What is the risk / complexity level of your project?

Q3.What type of contract do you require?

Q3.What type of contract do you require?

Engineering & Construction Short Contract The Engineering & Construction Short Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Engineering & Construction Short Subcontract The Engineering & Construction Short Subcontract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Engineering & Construction Contract The Engineering & Construction Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Engineering & Construction Subcontract The Engineering & Construction Subcontract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Professional Services Short Contract The Professional Services Short Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Professional Services Contract The Professional Services Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Term Service Short Contract The Term Service Short Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Term Service Contract The Term Service Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Supply Short Contract The Supply Short Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Supply Contract The Supply Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Framework Contract The Framework Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Adjudicators Contract The Adjudicators Contract is the most appropriate contract for your project:
View Contract X

Contact NEC Contact the NEC Team for further advice
View Contract X

X

Copyright © NEC® Contracts 2014, all rights reserved.
NEC® is a division of Thomas Telford Ltd, the commercial arm of the Institution of Civil Engineers.
Company Reg. No. (Thomas Telford Ltd): 2556636. VAT Reg. No: 240877747.

Institution of Civil Engineers Thomas Telford